Run the same scan ADA lawsuits cite.
axe-core 4.11 against a public URL — the open-source scanner widely used in accessibility audits. Automated WCAG 2.2 AA findings. Source-code guidance for common issues. No overlays.
Automated scanning catches roughly 57% of WCAG issues. Use this as a baseline, not a verdict. The $499 audit tests the issue classes automation cannot assess.
After the demand letter
You already paid for an overlay — AccessiBe, UserWay, Accessibly, or one of the other widget vendors. It didn’t stop the lawsuit. The complaint cited automated scan findings: missing alt text, broken form labels, low contrast on links. The kind of issues a widget can’t fix from the outside, because they live in your HTML.
Public lawsuits and demand letters routinely cite axe-core findings — the open-source scanner most accessibility auditors run before they write their reports. Running the same scanner yourself shows you what an auditor would flag, before someone else writes the complaint.
That’s what this is. Scan first, see what an accessibility audit would find, then fix it at the source. No widget on your site, no badge, no monthly fee for a “compliance score” that doesn’t appear in a courtroom.
Same engine. Same rules.
axe-core 4.11
Open-source. Maintained by Deque Systems. Widely used in accessibility audits, CI/CD pipelines, and GitHub's own accessibility scanner. We run the same checks an auditor would.
WCAG 2.2 AA
The latest stable accessibility standard. The axe-core ruleset tagged for WCAG 2.2 AA — the automated subset of level-AA. No bespoke “compliance score”: just the issues axe-core finds, mapped to WCAG 2.2 success criteria.
Source-code findings
Every issue points at the HTML element that caused it and the WCAG criterion it violates. Remediation guidance for common issues; axe-core rule references where curated guidance isn’t yet available. Designed for the engineer or agency who actually has to fix the site.
When the scan isn’t enough: the $499 audit
Keyboard and screen-reader testing — the full purchase path of your store, completed without a mouse and repeated with the NVDA screen reader running. This is where the purchase-blocking failures live, and no automated scan can find them.
Human judgment on what automation can’t assess — alt-text quality, text-over-image contrast, colour-only meaning, form error announcements, zoom and reflow.
A prioritised, evidence-backed report — every finding answers who it hurts, on which page, and what exactly to tell your developer, with a dated screenshot.
A dated record that remediation is underway — the material a merchant needs to back an accessibility statement they publish in good faith.
$499 flat. One-off, no subscription, no setup fee.
Monthly monitoring is available to audit customers afterwards, so the report doesn’t quietly go stale. Nothing to subscribe to up front.
What we won’t do
No accessibility badge or widget on your site. Nothing for visitors to see. Nothing to install in your theme.
No “lawsuit-proof” guarantee. Automated scanning catches roughly 57% of WCAG issues; the audit tests the issue classes automation cannot assess. We don’t claim what no honest tool can deliver.
No automatic source-code edits. We show you the fix. You apply it (or your developer / agency does). The report is the artifact, not a pull request.
No third-party tracking pixels in your scan reports. Reports go to you directly. No re-targeting, no shared analytics partner.
For agencies
Managing multiple sites? Email support@screenmy.site.